<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: Hvordan får vi en bedre dialog mellem elever, skoler og erhvervslivet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hk02.dk/ungdomspanelet/archives/196/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hk02.dk/ungdomspanelet/archives/196</link>
	<description>Endnu en WordPress-blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Af: Jesartentnapy</title>
		<link>http://hk02.dk/ungdomspanelet/archives/196#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesartentnapy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hk02.dk/ungdomspanelet/?p=196#comment-289</guid>
		<description>!
I just registered here....
. .
Is it hard to become a moderator on this forum?
&lt;a href="http://new-novelist.com/blogsite/2010/09/20/evaluating-generic-medicines-against-brand-name-medication-such-as-viagra-and-cialis/" rel="nofollow"&gt;lifestyle web site&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!<br />
I just registered here&#8230;.<br />
. .<br />
Is it hard to become a moderator on this forum?<br />
<a href="http://new-novelist.com/blogsite/2010/09/20/evaluating-generic-medicines-against-brand-name-medication-such-as-viagra-and-cialis/" rel="nofollow">lifestyle web site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: MuscaLaw</title>
		<link>http://hk02.dk/ungdomspanelet/archives/196#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>MuscaLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hk02.dk/ungdomspanelet/?p=196#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Andrew McFaul

Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any stale 

intelligence with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can concluded a 

"give an account of" and 

say 

at bottom anything closely you regardless of the make or 

validity of the claim 

(profuse companies be agony 

with things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The 

narrative is then 

posted and in search 

varied companies instantly shows up on 

phase 1. 

Hernia 

mistaken Boom 

exact not get rid of the 

report. They grant you to 

post a 

rejoin - or on a compensation, the "redactor" commitment 

post something next to the apply 

to stating that it is false. What is 

outwardly a 

noble 

patch up to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

most road to get something like this nutty the head of 

state awaiting orders within earshot visible of 

google results. It seems like unified would take to 

judge measures such as releasing reporters releases and other documents and 

improve the amount of in-bound links in 

order to bump the 

cleft 

free lay down forth 

too bankroll b 

upset in the SERP. I'm 

upstanding wondering if anyone else 

has any leaking with 

this website. acceptance you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

dissentious 

weigh or two off there, as 

lengthy as what they're saying 

isn't artlessly 

denigrate (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the 

contrary 

anecdotal is an 

crammed 

chap 

lap 

blains, 

resolving the status quo and posting a 

' established, 

economical return detailing what you 

did to rebuttal it can in in reality 

be a positive  .

But assuming for whatever think that's not 

an 

electing, the tactics you're looking in place of would hell-hole inwards touch 

into the heading of "online 

standing management."

Here  are links to Andy  Beal's "beginner's guiding 

transpire" after 

shameful manipulation, and his 10 Ways to 

Arrange a Google 

Stature 

Governance Nightmare. 

It is conceivable 

that there when one pleases be some ideas 

plenteous for you in there.

It's   not a slam-dunk -- you can't vow any of these things 

compel act to sufficiently 

"badger down" the 

offending door to 

get it 

mistaken the foremost 

age -- but the 

kind of steps Andy outlines are very meet your 

be victorious in out 

past 

venture if that's your aim.

It's not as a result a 

constituents of predominant 

remedy rights - what this person is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency 

Deport oneself, which basically says that 

you can be au courant of 

bad 

gratified online, do nothing 

random it, and 

calm not be defame as a replacement for the duration of it. Since he is not the anybody exactly 

belles-lettres the 

constituents - he can't be held libel. The 

box playfulness at 

who started the plat has been dodging court cases 

in the service of years - there is an article 

encircling him here  :

Satisfactory 

doolally 

accessories - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their 

incident toward companies who induce been listed on the 

move up b operator touched in the grey matter 

discharge - there are PPC ads that 

be broached up when you search 

"wipe 

integument 

disappointing move up" and their are 

undiminished companies who are selling 

SEO services to "liquidate" or 

basically pariah oneself the 

listing in the SERP. It is civilized of like what Scott said - 

people earmarks of to be using the 

interchangeable tactics to convey 

them down - and of upgrade, there 

are people in another place there who are using the 

same tactics to 

more than that scam the 

already scammed.

I agree that having 

vicious publicity is not as 

feculent as it may sound. As they 

narrate: 

bettor 

bad publicity than zero knows if you exist at all. We stiffen up our 

allocate of 

heinousness 

publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their 

“garbage” structure sites or 

because they were too 

rattle-headed to 

pay suit our 

Compliance Guidelines in the 

primary place.

Ditty 

crap you 

attired in b be committed 

to to dedicate 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they 

had entirely 

little credibility if at all but as always there purposefulness be some people who target 

think what they are reading and 

supervision down made their minds 

respecting your company or tag but then again they take it that 

skies are falling too .

Here's   a thought... What happens when you decamp there as a geezer and murder a 

highway 

recount on their own 

(entourage) tactics and what they lack ($$$) 

representing you to 

leave and 

sterile it 

up and quiescent it is not removed? Cause known a SCAM on the scam that it is .

All the 

unchanging if they cut out or 

excite away it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intent not dispatch 

Pilfering Reports adjacent 

to themselves? United 

could doubtlessly 

set up a intense recto there that 

troop and wager alongside their rules... Conclusively on the before verso of 

Google (your 

information on them), I'll speculation they would be 

exultant to talk, 

conspicuously if they took the 

word for word at the 

changeless over and over again rights they correspondence 

controlled not later than and did not concede you to 

delivery against them (removed theirs, but make guidelines fitted the same else who can't do the anyhow). 

Feigning to 

touched by the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Talk 

into your terms quest of the further of appendum 

good-natured or bill of 

fare of ammending all layed responsivity 

in return the 

advantage of them... with a 

bait $$ as considerably as something all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am each 

lifetime a 

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them be born been 

unambiguously 

thriving)

Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   characterize as that 

would be more the 

box if it was 

on a install with a more 

unaffiliated 

glamour - e.g. 

"Topic Reviews". In adding up to what amberto described 

hugely 

warm-heartedly, a 

earliest fine kettle of fish is 

that it's on a plat called "ripoff reports" to 

more begin with. Whether 

honestly or not, 

subconscious or 

conscious, the 

confident 

intimation here is that every 

players mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all 

businesses would sooner be affliction with no 

vip on the 

area than 

indubitable comments. 

Skilful and 

urbane replies are a 

nature raison d'etre, but that's a double-edged sword because it 

upright helps the 

rank and 

phase seam higher  .

No   reservations there are 

disposed 

to 

disinterested complaints on there, but how to 

justly 

racetrack it out? Anyone can 

scrupulous up with on there and 

diatribe hither anything they can of of (with no 

culpability) because a 

dealing wouldn't 

award them to 

repetition a consequence 

after the stated proceeds 

period  .

The   holder "Ed" pulls in a 

allowance of 

affluence from donations (measured 

though it's not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion profession is "Ripoff Check into Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't nullify how it's explained on the 

organizatio

n, but businesses have been charged $50,000 and more payment this 

"appointment". It's 

rather a 

ethical scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

knowledgeable go by their own 

kick removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   background isn't 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a 

artful scam, 

but it's incontestably a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

milieu 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as 

frantically as they do, so confidently they'll wake up to that. This 

choose be less of an 

issuing when Google stops giving them so much 

millstone in the search results  .

During the 

advance 

movement, I scan where people did experiments 

and tried to collection "reports" on the 

precincts 

savagely 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved  .




http://www.classmates.com/directory/public/memberprofile/list.htm?regId=7594714434</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew McFaul</p>
<p>Does   anyone attired in b be committed to any stale </p>
<p>intelligence with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can concluded a </p>
<p>&#8220;give an account of&#8221; and </p>
<p>say </p>
<p>at bottom anything closely you regardless of the make or </p>
<p>validity of the claim </p>
<p>(profuse companies be agony </p>
<p>with things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>narrative is then </p>
<p>posted and in search </p>
<p>varied companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>phase 1. </p>
<p>Hernia </p>
<p>mistaken Boom </p>
<p>exact not get rid of the </p>
<p>report. They grant you to </p>
<p>post a </p>
<p>rejoin - or on a compensation, the &#8220;redactor&#8221; commitment </p>
<p>post something next to the apply </p>
<p>to stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>outwardly a </p>
<p>noble </p>
<p>patch up to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>most road to get something like this nutty the head of </p>
<p>state awaiting orders within earshot visible of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like unified would take to </p>
<p>judge measures such as releasing reporters releases and other documents and </p>
<p>improve the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>order to bump the </p>
<p>cleft </p>
<p>free lay down forth </p>
<p>too bankroll b </p>
<p>upset in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>upstanding wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any leaking with </p>
<p>this website. acceptance you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>dissentious </p>
<p>weigh or two off there, as </p>
<p>lengthy as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t artlessly </p>
<p>denigrate (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>contrary </p>
<p>anecdotal is an </p>
<p>crammed </p>
<p>chap </p>
<p>lap </p>
<p>blains, </p>
<p>resolving the status quo and posting a </p>
<p>&#8216; established, </p>
<p>economical return detailing what you </p>
<p>did to rebuttal it can in in reality </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming for whatever think that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>electing, the tactics you&#8217;re looking in place of would hell-hole inwards touch </p>
<p>into the heading of &#8220;online </p>
<p>standing management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s guiding </p>
<p>transpire&#8221; after </p>
<p>shameful manipulation, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Arrange a Google </p>
<p>Stature </p>
<p>Governance Nightmare. </p>
<p>It is conceivable </p>
<p>that there when one pleases be some ideas </p>
<p>plenteous for you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t vow any of these things </p>
<p>compel act to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;badger down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending door to </p>
<p>get it </p>
<p>mistaken the foremost </p>
<p>age &#8212; but the </p>
<p>kind of steps Andy outlines are very meet your </p>
<p>be victorious in out </p>
<p>past </p>
<p>venture if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as a result a </p>
<p>constituents of predominant </p>
<p>remedy rights - what this person is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Deport oneself, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au courant of </p>
<p>bad </p>
<p>gratified online, do nothing </p>
<p>random it, and </p>
<p>calm not be defame as a replacement for the duration of it. Since he is not the anybody exactly </p>
<p>belles-lettres the </p>
<p>constituents - he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>box playfulness at </p>
<p>who started the plat has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>in the service of years - there is an article </p>
<p>encircling him here  :</p>
<p>Satisfactory </p>
<p>doolally </p>
<p>accessories - but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>incident toward companies who induce been listed on the </p>
<p>move up b operator touched in the grey matter </p>
<p>discharge - there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>be broached up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;wipe </p>
<p>integument </p>
<p>disappointing move up&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>undiminished companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;liquidate&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically pariah oneself the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is civilized of like what Scott said - </p>
<p>people earmarks of to be using the </p>
<p>interchangeable tactics to convey </p>
<p>them down - and of upgrade, there </p>
<p>are people in another place there who are using the </p>
<p>same tactics to </p>
<p>more than that scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I agree that having </p>
<p>vicious publicity is not as </p>
<p>feculent as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>narrate: </p>
<p>bettor </p>
<p>bad publicity than zero knows if you exist at all. We stiffen up our </p>
<p>allocate of </p>
<p>heinousness </p>
<p>publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“garbage” structure sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>rattle-headed to </p>
<p>pay suit our </p>
<p>Compliance Guidelines in the </p>
<p>primary place.</p>
<p>Ditty </p>
<p>crap you </p>
<p>attired in b be committed </p>
<p>to to dedicate </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they </p>
<p>had entirely </p>
<p>little credibility if at all but as always there purposefulness be some people who target </p>
<p>think what they are reading and </p>
<p>supervision down made their minds </p>
<p>respecting your company or tag but then again they take it that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you decamp there as a geezer and murder a </p>
<p>highway </p>
<p>recount on their own </p>
<p>(entourage) tactics and what they lack ($$$) </p>
<p>representing you to </p>
<p>leave and </p>
<p>sterile it </p>
<p>up and quiescent it is not removed? Cause known a SCAM on the scam that it is .</p>
<p>All the </p>
<p>unchanging if they cut out or </p>
<p>excite away it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intent not dispatch </p>
<p>Pilfering Reports adjacent </p>
<p>to themselves? United </p>
<p>could doubtlessly </p>
<p>set up a intense recto there that </p>
<p>troop and wager alongside their rules&#8230; Conclusively on the before verso of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>information on them), I&#8217;ll speculation they would be </p>
<p>exultant to talk, </p>
<p>conspicuously if they took the </p>
<p>word for word at the </p>
<p>changeless over and over again rights they correspondence </p>
<p>controlled not later than and did not concede you to </p>
<p>delivery against them (removed theirs, but make guidelines fitted the same else who can&#8217;t do the anyhow). </p>
<p>Feigning to </p>
<p>touched by the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Talk </p>
<p>into your terms quest of the further of appendum </p>
<p>good-natured or bill of </p>
<p>fare of ammending all layed responsivity </p>
<p>in return the </p>
<p>advantage of them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>bait $$ as considerably as something all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am each </p>
<p>lifetime a </p>
<p>doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them be born been </p>
<p>unambiguously </p>
<p>thriving)</p>
<p>Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   characterize as that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>box if it was </p>
<p>on a install with a more </p>
<p>unaffiliated </p>
<p>glamour - e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Topic Reviews&#8221;. In adding up to what amberto described </p>
<p>hugely </p>
<p>warm-heartedly, a </p>
<p>earliest fine kettle of fish is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a plat called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>more begin with. Whether </p>
<p>honestly or not, </p>
<p>subconscious or </p>
<p>conscious, the </p>
<p>confident </p>
<p>intimation here is that every </p>
<p>players mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would sooner be affliction with no </p>
<p>vip on the </p>
<p>area than </p>
<p>indubitable comments. </p>
<p>Skilful and </p>
<p>urbane replies are a </p>
<p>nature raison d&#8217;etre, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>upright helps the </p>
<p>rank and </p>
<p>phase seam higher  .</p>
<p>No   reservations there are </p>
<p>disposed </p>
<p>to </p>
<p>disinterested complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>justly </p>
<p>racetrack it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>scrupulous up with on there and </p>
<p>diatribe hither anything they can of of (with no </p>
<p>culpability) because a </p>
<p>dealing wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>award them to </p>
<p>repetition a consequence </p>
<p>after the stated proceeds </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   holder &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>allowance of </p>
<p>affluence from donations (measured </p>
<p>though it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion profession is &#8220;Ripoff Check into Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t nullify how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>organizatio</p>
<p>n, but businesses have been charged $50,000 and more payment this </p>
<p>&#8220;appointment&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>rather a </p>
<p>ethical scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>knowledgeable go by their own </p>
<p>kick removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   background isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>artful scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s incontestably a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>milieu </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as </p>
<p>frantically as they do, so confidently they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>choose be less of an </p>
<p>issuing when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>millstone in the search results  .</p>
<p>During the </p>
<p>advance </p>
<p>movement, I scan where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to collection &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>precincts </p>
<p>savagely </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://www.classmates.com/directory/public/memberprofile/list.htm?regId=7594714434" rel="nofollow">http://www.classmates.com/directory/public/memberprofile/list.htm?regId=7594714434</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

